LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

U

Search

Many Voices, One Freedom: United in the 1st Amendment

June 20, 2024

M

Menu

!

Menu

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Featured Offer      Link to our SHOP

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“Environmental assessment and review” was essentially begun in the 1960s as a way of ensuring that environmental considerations were explored systematically when governments were making decisions about whether to issue permits to allow the construction of major projects to proceed. This, in itself, did not elevate environmental considerations above all other public interest considerations such as the economic, social, health, financial, engineering, and other matters. 

The problem was that the processes for environmental assessment and review were enshrined in legislation and then in regulations. This gave the environmentalists a lever that they could use to challenge the lawfulness of permits on the grounds that the processes used did not comply precisely with the provisions of the legislation and regulations. Activist judges colluded with activist environmentalists to make the process of defending a permit near impossible.

The situation was made worse when the scope of “environmental assessment” was expanded to require a high level of public engagement (i.e., multiple opportunities for “community groups” to submit comments and participate as intervenors in regulatory proceedings and court reviews, often at public expense). No one ever challenged this on the grounds that it elevated the interests of those who advocate for environmental objectives above those who advocate for economic development or other public interest considerations. Well-funded environmental groups were thus successful in delaying environmental reviews and subsequent permitting for years, sometimes decades, and adding greatly to the costs of the projects (which, of course, are ultimately paid by the public).

The latest blow to the coherence of this process was the inclusion of “climate” considerations within the list of environmental considerations. When one realizes that humans have no measurable or certainly significant impact on the Earth’s climate, the arrogance of these regulations boggles the mind.

The “left” and radical environmentalists are essentially widening these considerations to embrace the wrong-headed idea that any and all increases in greenhouse gas emissions run counter to the “imperative” of achieving “net-zero” emissions. President Biden and his puppet masters have now placed the “climate consideration” into the Law of The Land. 

If you recognize that virtually every new construction project in the past half-century has been slowed by the potential protection of some unthreatened animal, insect, or fish, you will have trouble getting your arms around the fact that it will get worse.

It is hard to say what a Republican House of Representatives can or will do when they take over next January, but at a minimum, they should try to have the latest changes reversed. They can’t pass legislation alone, but they can put pressure on the current administration in other ways to do so. In a perfect world, they would repeal those sections of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) that prescribe the ways in which environmental assessment and review must be conducted and the scope of matters that should be considered. The unknowable controls over the environment should not be among them. We must level the playing field between environmental interests and other public interest considerations. Environmental zealots have ruled too much of our nation for too long.

But as the TV salesmen often say, WAIT, THERE IS MORE, and indeed there is.

In April, the White House restored three core elements of the aforementioned National Environmental Policy Act that had been rolled back under the Trump administration. Tighter environmental scrutiny for energy projects during the federal review process has been reinstalled.

Enacted in 1969, NEPA is a cornerstone of the federal permitting process for a wide range of activities. It applies to upstream oil and gas development, as well as the construction of fossil and renewable energy infrastructure, roads, bridges, and transit systems.

The Trump Administration’s overhaul of NEPA was designed to streamline the approval process for major infrastructure projects, including oil and gas pipelines, which advanced economic progress without threatening the environment. 

The current White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) now requires federal agencies to evaluate all relevant environmental impacts — including those associated with climate change – during environmental reviews.”

It requires agencies to consider the direct,’ ‘indirect,and cumulativeimpacts of a proposed action, by fully evaluating climate change impacts and assessing the consequences of releasing additional pollution in communities that are already overburdened by polluted air or dirty water. 

Remember the gas you exhale; carbon dioxide is considered a pollutant, and who is deciding what community has dirty air and water? Actually, they are few and far between in America today but trust us, if this continues, there will be no project that can’t be effectively stopped. But, of course, that is the whole idea to bring the nation to its knees and obtain total control over the lives of our citizens.

CEO Chair Brenda Mallory indicated that restoring the old framework would make project approvals less susceptible to legal challenges; she said,

Restoring these basic community safeguards will provide regulatory certainty, reduce conflict, and help ensure that projects get built right the first time,” Mallory said. Patching these holes in the environmental review process will help projects get built faster, be more resilient, and provide greater benefits – to people who live nearby.”

We were not there when she said these things, but we can’t believe she told them with a straight face.

American Petroleum Institute (API) Senior VP Frank Macchiarola was quoted after the new ruling that “high energy costs for American consumers and European allies looking to the U.S. for access to an affordable and stable energy supply will be thwarted.

Macchiarola also explained the recently announced task force between the United States and European Union to shore up the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe in order to lessen its dependence on Russian natural gas. He said, “an effective and efficient NEPA process is critical to expanding LNG export projects, which will likely require additional interstate pipeline capacity.” 

Without a reasonable permitting system that no longer exists, infrastructure projects crucial to U.S. energy security cannot be constructed under a timeframe that reflects the urgency for which they are needed.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Marty Durbin, senior vice president of policy, spoke out against the new rules as well. We loved his quote: “It should never take longer to get federal approval for an infrastructure project than it takes to build the project.” That will be the result of the administration’s changes that revert back to the broken 1978 NEPA review process.

A more efficient permitting process is critical for building modern infrastructure, including new roads, renewable energy facilities, telecommunications, and other critical forms of infrastructure.”

With rapidly rising inflation, major supply chain disruptions, and workforce shortages, the US needs less red tape, not more.

Adding insult to injury to the harm the puppet masters are inflicting on our nation from the White House is their repeated commitment to achieving environmental justice and confronting climate change.

None of this surprises those of us knowing well that they aim to destroy the benefits of capitalism as the only system to have raised the standard of living everywhere it exists.

MANY VOICES, ONE FREEDOM: UNITED IN THE 1ST AMENDMENT

Join our community: Your insights matter. Contribute to the diversity of thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sitewide Newsfeed

More Stories
.pp-sub-widget {display:none;} .walk-through-history {display:none;} .powerpress_links {display:none;} .powerpress_embed_box {display:none;}
Share via
Copy link