Trust the science. When many were hesitant in 2021 about undergoing experimental gene therapy injections newly branded as COVID-19 “vaccines,” this was the message repeatedly thrust on the American public by the Biden administration. “Follow the science,” we were told by Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to President Biden, who shockingly and notoriously declared himself actually to be the science.
But what exactly was this science? It was, in large part, government-funded and endorsed experimental gene therapy bio-injections brought to you by some less-than-trustworthy pharmaceutical giants. It was a novel and experimental Department of Defense-funded science – gene therapy that had never before been widely deployed, yet came neatly packaged in tidy messenger RNA injections disguised as vaccines.
We were falsely promised by the Biden administration and pharmaceutical companies – who were covertly working in lockstep with each other, as well as mainstream and social media, NGOs, and a host of other influential voices – that this science would protect us from spreading COVID-19 to loved ones. We were also promised that following this science would provide a path out of our pandemic-fueled fear and isolation. We were deceived and lied to.
At the height of the pandemic, government-curated science in the form of mRNA injections had made its way into every aspect of our lives, sometimes without our even realizing it. We have previously written about government infiltration of our most trusted relationships, relationships which were exploited as covert government-bribed “trusted messengers.” The mRNA injection science was literally all around us, at every turn, whether we consciously realized it or not.
When we turned on a sporting event, there was science advertising to us from stadiums and between plays. When we called in refills for a prescription, there was the science, on the other end of the phone, a recorded voice urging us to get our COVID-19 “vaccine.” One couldn’t visit a grocery store without being bombarded with science. If you doubt this, try to recall a time in your life, before the pandemic, when picking up a gallon of milk led to a front-row seat where you witnessed experimental drug injections being carried out in the lobby – administered by your familiar grocery store clerk to local friends and neighbors. Something as ubiquitous as the local grocery store became a public stage for pushing the government’s curated science, normalizing the most controversial and dangerous experiments ever conducted on humanity.
Meanwhile, doctors who dared to question the government’s version of science, or hesitated to blindly trust in experimental gene therapy bio-injections as the sole pandemic exit strategy, were deemed “fringe” and “dangerous,” according to NIH Director Francis Collins, as testified to by Fauci in his November 23, 2022 deposition (pages 271-273).
But should we have been unwittingly convinced to trust the science? If Pfizer’s legal track record is any indication, and if the growing numbers of vaccine dead and injured are any indication, the answer is resoundingly, “No.”
CNN Issues a Prescient Warning in 2020 – Rushing a Vaccine is Dangerous
Flashback to the fall of 2020, before rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines. Trump was still in office. In a news report CNN and Google apparently forgot to whitewash from the internet, CNN issued a stark warning about the dangers of a rushed vaccine, questioning whether any COVID-19 vaccine developed under Trump’s “warp speed” program could ever be considered safe. CNN’s warning turned out to be prophetic.
In retrospect, both the timing and anti-vaccine position of CNN’s piece is fascinating. Published in September of 2020, CNN’s piece would undoubtedly be branded misinformation today. In the article, progressive CNN gave voice to a remarkably different position from the pro-vaccine position it adheres to today. The 2020 CNN piece is revealing: it raises valid questions about whether there is truly any honesty or objectivity left in mainstream reporting. But it also details the risks inherent in a rushed experimental vaccine, and in many ways, was prescient. Quoting a pediatrician and University of Michigan professor, CNN wrote:
- [P]eople’s mistrust of the system makes the idea that the FDA would rush this process before late-stage clinical trials are complete “colossally stupid.”
- “All it takes is one bad side effect to basically botch a vaccine program that we desperately need against this virus. It’s a prescription for disaster.”
- “This could do substantial damage” … the clinical trial process needs to be followed to the end.
- A too-early EUA for a vaccine could cause a “nightmare scenario,” for a few reasons. One, the vaccine may not be safe. Two, if it is not safe, people will lose faith in vaccines.
- “People are going to die unnecessarily if we take chances with this,” Kinch said. “We’ve got to get this right.”
In 2020, CNN nailed it.
Pfizer – A Pharmaceutical Company with a Troubled Past
Americans had a host of other reasons not to blindly trust pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer to singlehandedly lead us out of the pandemic with an experimental drug. One reason was Pfizer’s own sordid legal history. Pfizer is one of the most notorious pharmaceutical manufacturers in modern history. In 2009 Pfizer paid $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil charges related to illegal promotion and fraudulent marketing of its products, in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the U.S. Department of Justice. Why don’t more Americans know this important fact about Pfizer? And why don’t those in government who curated the science care?
The 2009 U.S. Department of Justice incident was not Pfizer’s only run-in with the law. In 1996, Pfizer seized upon an opportunity to gain traction in a multi-billion pharmaceutical market when it tested experimental anti-infection drug, Trovan, during a disastrous 1996 meningitis epidemic in the state of Kano in Nigeria. In the midst of the epidemic, Pfizer fast-tracked clinical trials for Trovan, an experimental pediatric meningitis drug which it tested on sick Nigerian children. As part of the trial, Pfizer experimented on over two hundred critically ill and vulnerable African children, who many allege unwittingly took part in this botched and rushed clinical trial.
For some who participated in the clinical trial, following the science reportedly proved disastrous, leading Forbes to later refer to the episode as “Pfizer’s Nigerian Nightmare.” Just a month after the clinical trial began, eleven children had reportedly died, and dozens of Nigerian parents alleged that the clinical trial “had left their children paralyzed, deaf, mute or blind.”
It took years for the legal battles against Pfizer, who denied all wrongdoing, to play out. The Nigerian government reportedly sued Pfizer over the ordeal, initially seeking $8.5 billion and jail sentences for various Pfizer officials. The Nigerian government ultimately enlisted a panel of experts to investigate, which found “Pfizer at fault in the children’s deaths and guilty of conducting human trials without informed consent.” Multiple lawsuits were filed against Pfizer, and it took over 15 years for settlements in some of those cases to be reached.
History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new. Ecclesiastes 1:9
It is often said that history repeats itself – and such is the case today. As predicted in the CNN piece published in 2020, pharmaceutical science would again prove disastrous with a fast track to the COVID-19 vaccines. As had occurred previously, pharmaceutical giants would again exploit disasters to push novel and experimental drugs while suppressing effective early treatment for the sake of profiteering. As had occurred previously, those involved would again deny any and all responsibility for unethical actions. And, as CNN’s vaccine warning piece tragically predicted in 2020, many people would unnecessarily die as a result.
Some allegations made against Pfizer in the 1996 Trovan trial sound eerily familiar to allegations being made against Pfizer today in connection with the COVID-19 “vaccines.” For example, Nigerian plaintiffs alleged that children were enrolled in the Trovan trial without informed consent. Parents alleged they were never informed that a proven and free treatment was readily available to their critically sick children – at the very same hospital, no less. Court documents reportedly alleged Pfizer intentionally “low-dosed the control drug” to decrease its potential effectiveness when compared to Pfizer’s test drug, Trovan.
Other eerie similarities to what Forbes termed “Pfizer’s Nigerian Nightmare” have emerged. Similar to the Trovan disaster, claims that the COVID-19 vaccines are responsible for damaging and killing many have been made but have fallen on deaf ears. Following claims that the Trovan clinical trials had resulted in the deaths of eleven children and maimed many others, Pfizer claimed that the disease itself, meningitis, had killed and harmed the children, not their experimental drug, Trovan. Pfizer whistleblower Juan Walterspiel, former associate medical director of Pfizer’s central research division, alleged that Pfizer fired him after he called methods Pfizer employed in the Nigerian study “improper and unsafe.” Similarly, the British Medical Journal reported that whistleblower Brook Jackson was allegedly fired after notifying the FDA that breaches had occurred in data integrity and patient safety at one of the sites where the Pfizer vaccine was undergoing clinical trials.
A Growing Mistrust of Science?
In addition to Pfizer’s troubled past, mounting evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are harming and maiming persons around the globe is contributing to a distrust of government and its curated pandemic “science.” What makes claims of harm involving the mRNA vaccines more egregious than the Trovan claims is not only the sheer scale of the vaccine’s deployment, but also the government’s covert and disingenuous collusion with big pharma, private and social media companies, not-for-profit medical associations, and a host of others who continue pushing a flawed drug now widely known to be dangerous.
Perhaps it is no wonder that the new documentary Died Suddenly has gone viral, amassing more than 13 million views as of this writing. One of the predominant themes running through the film is the erosion of Americans’ trust in government – in particular, a government-controlled and curated science.
In many ways, we can all relate to Chad Whisnat, an earnest and genteel funeral director who is introduced early in the film. Whisnat remarks he has seen an increase in unexplained sudden deaths since roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines. Embalmers in the film, report seeing an increase of blood clots since the roll-out of the vaccines, along with the emergence of large, fibrous blood clots not previously seen. Yes, Whisnat and the embalmers in Died Suddenly have seen death during the pandemic in a way that most perhaps haven’t. Yet, Whisnat represents a growing sentiment shared by many when it comes to trusting the “science,” when he plainly states, “I don’t want to take any vaccine, because I don’t trust the pharmaceutical industry.”
Today, Chad Whisnat nails it.
Comments