Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is for educational, general information, and entertainment purposes only and is never intended to constitute medical or legal advice or to replace the personalized care of a primary care practitioner or legal expert.
While we endeavor to keep this information up to date and correct, the information provided by America Out Loud, its website(s), and any properties (including its radio shows and podcasts) makes no representations, or warranties of any kind, expressed, or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to its website(s) or the information, products, services or related graphics and images contained on the website(s) for any purpose.
The opinions expressed on the website(s), and the opinions expressed on the radio shows and podcasts, are the opinions of the show hosts and do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or policies of anyone or any entity we may endorse. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
At no time, nor in any event, will we be liable for any loss, or damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss of data or profits arising out of, in an association of, or connection with the use of this website.
Through this website, users can link to other websites that may be listed. Those websites are not under the control of America Out Loud or its brands. We have no control over the nature, content, or availability of those sites. America Out Loud has no control over what the sites do with the information they collect. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation, nor does it endorse the views expressed with or by them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, America Out Loud takes no responsibility for, nor are we, and will not be liable for being temporarily unavailable due to technical difficulties beyond our control. America Out Loud does not sell, trade, nor market email addresses or other personal data.
When Pastor Stevens talked about patron and client relationship (unequal parties-one had more resources that the other) towards the end of his sermon, I had a difficulty understanding how he arrived at his point of view. Some of my cryptic notes from the sermon. Patron helps client. reciprocity gratitude service Client would give something back to patron for gift given by patron. Jesus is the patron. Friendship testing question do you love me. Jesus wanted to know if Peter was really his friend. patron-client conversation
My take on the Jesus- Peter conversation is, Jesus was questioning Peter’s ‘agape’ love for him. Have you so soon returned to the carnal employment where I first found you, fishing. Have you forgotten about spiritually ‘fishing for men’?
Jesus said the first two times to Peter ”do you ‘agape’/love me”, is nothing about fillial/friendship. But have you forsaken all, and are still spiritually following Jesus? Anannais and Sapphira. Peter answer all three times, ‘philo’/friendship you Jesus. Jesus seeing that he was getting nowhere with Peter, Jesus asked the third time ‘phileis’ me, hoping to get a better response from Peter.
It was ‘agape’ that hung on Calvary, not ’philo’/friendship. It is ‘agape’ that will judge this world. Regarding patronage,
Luke 22:25 — “Jesus is not among us as a benefactor , but as a servant”
Matthew 10:8 — Freely have you received (the power to heal and cast out devils), freely give.
Patron-client relations defined Roman social life, not the early Church.
That 2nd person personal pronoun ‘you’ is used throughout John 21, a personal relationship between Jesus and His disciples, not impersonal nor an arms length relation, but an “I in you, and you in me’ relationship.
John 21 is John’s version of the ‘great commission’ that Jesus gave to His disciples, like in Mark 16:15,16, Luke 24:47, and Matthew 28:19, 20
John 21 is full of verbs in the imperative mood, which in one sense ‘might be taken as commands from a superior to an inferior’, ie, client-patron. New Testament Greek Professor Daniel Wallace wrote,
“The imperative mood is the mood of intention. It is the mood furtherest removed from certainty. The imperative mood is the realm of violition (the imposition of one’s will upon another) and possibility. ..the imperative is most commonly used for commands….a command from a superior to an inferior rank”.—–in the book, “Greek Grammar beyond the basics”, by Daniel Wallace, page 485
It is the Church changing the world to be as it is in Heaven. And not the world changing the Church to as it is in Hell. In that sense we must impose the will of Jesus upon the World, and not assimilate Worldliness into the Church.
http://www.Blueletterbibble.org says of the Greek word ‘Bosko’, which is interpreted as the English word ‘feed’, means to “promote spiritual welfare of members of the church”, but is primarily used in the NT in a secular sense at , Matthew 8:30 Mark 5:11 Luke 8:32. But John 21:16 says ‘take care of/sheperd my sheep’. Protect my sheep from the wolves in sheep clothing that are in the Church. The ‘great commission’ of God to the Church.
We see the provisional nature of God in John 21. While we seek to work out a solution, God has already provided a way (ie, the fish already on the fire cooking). We see the omniscience (all knowingness) of God in John 21, knowledge of exactly where the fish were hiding. We see the omnipotence of God in John 21:11, “Simon Peter climbed aboard and dragged the net to shore”, a net of 153 big fish. At five pounds a piece, close to 800 pounds. Certainly Peter had help with that net and those fishes, an omnipotent (all powerful) God got those fish to shore, without a tear in the net.
Yes, confidence and trustworthiness in God is necessary, but don’t let your ‘agape’ (what you are required to do by God such as tithe, not worship idols, not live carnally outside of marriage) get sloppy.